Legislation Details

File #: 26-0932    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/7/2026 In control: City Council Meeting
On agenda: 5/12/2026 Final action:
Title: Appeal No. 26-0001: Request to overturn the Planning Commission's March 17, 2026 decision adopting a Categorical Exemption per Section 15332 (Class No. 32) and approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 18-000005 (TPM No. 19950), and Design Review No. 18-000010 - a request to split one (1) parcel into two (2) and for site and architectural approval for the development of two (2) new industrial commerce center buildings of 41,218 square feet and 30,767 square feet with associated site improvements on 3.98 acres located north of Hilton Drive and west of Hemlock Avenue, and identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 1110-151-03.
Attachments: 1. Attachment No. 1 - Vicinity Map, 2. Attachment No. 2 - Appellant Letter, 3. Attachment No. 3 - Response to Appellant Letter, 4. Attachment No. 4 - Justification Memo with Appendices, 5. Attachment No. 5 - PC Staff Report Package, 6. Attachment No. 6 - PC Minutes of March 17 2026, 7. Attachment No. 7 - Clerk of Board Fee Receipt and NOE, 8. Attachment No. 8 - Public Hearing Notice

FROM:

Planning Department

 

SUBJECT:

Title

Appeal No. 26-0001: Request to overturn the Planning Commission’s March 17, 2026 decision adopting a Categorical Exemption per Section 15332 (Class No. 32) and approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 18-000005 (TPM No. 19950), and Design Review No. 18-000010 - a request to split one (1) parcel into two (2) and for site and architectural approval for the development of two (2) new industrial commerce center buildings of 41,218 square feet and 30,767 square feet with associated site improvements on 3.98 acres located north of Hilton Drive and west of Hemlock Avenue, and identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 1110-151-03.

End

 

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation

Deny Appeal No. 26-0001, thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s decision on March 17, 2026, approving, pursuant to a categorical exemption under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section No. 15332 (Class No. 32. Infill Development), Tentative Parcel Map No. 18-000005 (TPM No. 19950) and Design Review No. 18-000010 to split one (1) parcel into two (2) and for site and architectural approval for the development of two (2) new industrial commerce center buildings of 41,218 square feet and 30,767 square feet, with associated site improvements, on 3.98 acres located north of Hilton Drive and west of Hemlock Avenue, and identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 1110-151-03.

End

 

COUNCIL GOALS:

                     Promote economic development by concentrating on job creation.

                     Promote economic development by establishing a quick, consistent development process.

                     Promote economic development by being business friendly at all levels and striving to constantly improve the city's competitiveness.

 

APPELLANT / APPEAL APPLICANT:

Appeal No. 26-0001: Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility, 1939 Harrison Street, Suite No. 150, Oakland, CA 94612.

 

DISCUSSION:

At its March 17, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 18-000005 (TPM No. 19950) and Design Review No. 18-000010, pursuant to a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15332 (Class No. 32), with adoption of Resolution PC Number 2026-006 on a 5-0 vote.  The pertinent staff report and attachments for the March 17, 2026 Planning Commission hearing, along with meeting minutes, are included as part of Attachments No. 5 and 6.

 

 

On March 25, 2026, the City received Appeal No. 25-0002 from Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility. In summary, the appellant contends that the decision to approve the project should not be upheld because the project does not qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA.  The appeal letter requests that the City rescind the Project approvals, conduct an initial study, and prepare either a mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report, to analyze and mitigate the Project’s environmental impacts.  No evidence supporting the appellant’s position was provided in the letter.

 

The project environmental consultant (Lilburn Corporation), who prepared the original CEQA Class No. 32 (In-Fill Development) Categorical Exemption Memorandum (Attachment No. 4) for the Hilton Industrial Commerce Center Project, has also prepared a written response (Attachment No. 3) to the applicant’s letter.  The response further explains that substantial evidence supports the City’s determination that the categorical exemption from CEQA was appropriate.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

 

MOTION:

Approve staff’s recommendation.

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment No. 1 - Vicinity Map

Attachment No. 2 - Appellant Letter - Lozeau Drury/Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility, March 25, 2026

Attachment No. 3 - Environmental Consultant Response Letter, April 14, 2026

Attachment No. 4 - Justification Memorandum for the Categorical Exemption

Attachment No. 5 - Planning Commission March 17, 2026, Report

Attachment No. 6 - Planning Commission Minutes of March 17, 2026

Attachment No. 7 - Clerk of the Board Fee Receipt and NOE

Attachment No. 8 - Public Hearing Notice